Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Rohde results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,556 hits . Analysis detected 17,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,505 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 45% (5,212 of 9,471 authors). This David Rohde is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. David Rohde
Author details
Total words: 17,505
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst