Author summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Bergstrom results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (3,251 of 8,946 authors). This Danielle Bergstrom is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group. Danielle Bergstrom
Author details
Total words: 2,384
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst