Author summary
46%1 analyzed article/video509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan DeFrancesco results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 623 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,527 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,309 of 9,483 authors). This Dan DeFrancesco is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Dan DeFrancesco
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
76%Dan DeFrancesco (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,527
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.2%6.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 9.4%9.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos