Author summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Connie Rusk results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Indoctrination , and Optimism Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 377 hits . Analysis detected 2,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,854 of 9,487 authors). This Connie Rusk is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Connie Rusk
Author details
Total words: 2,184
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.5% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 17.3% 17.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Author 17.3%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst