Author summary
86% 16 analyzed articles/videos 15,849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ciara Hulet results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 3,578 hits . Analysis detected 46,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,781 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (6,494 of 8,704 authors). This Ciara Hulet is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Ciara Hulet
Author details
Total words: 55,781
Article count: 16
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score16 analyzed articles55.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst