Author summary
⁠9%2 analyzed articles/videos285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chelsea Lubbe results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 278 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,625 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (4,086 of 9,471 authors). This Chelsea Lubbe is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Chelsea Lubbe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠57%Chelsea Lubbe (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,625
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos