Author summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 808 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Jacobs results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 362 hits . Analysis detected 3,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,685 of 9,487 authors). This Charles Jacobs is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Charles Jacobs
Author details
Total words: 2,424
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.2% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.7% 8.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.3% 13.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.7% 14.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.8% 12.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.9% 14.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.7%, sitewide 0.5% Straw Man: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.9% In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst