Author summary
85%4 analyzed articles/videos5,921 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cathy Young results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 4,301 hits. Analysis detected 28,322 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,684 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 56% (3,917 of 8,803 authors). This Cathy Young is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Cathy Young
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
56%Cathy Young (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 23,684
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles23.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.2%18.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos