Author summary
34%5 analyzed articles/videos1,263 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Dominguez results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 3,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,052 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,493 of 8,802 authors). This Catherine Dominguez is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Catherine Dominguez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
38%Catherine Dominguez (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,052
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510037.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate