Author summary
77% 10 analyzed articles/videos 11,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caryn James results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 10,493 hits . Analysis detected 52,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,336 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 34% (6,291 of 9,471 authors). This Caryn James is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Caryn James
Author details
Total words: 60,336
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles60.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.4% 17.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst