Author summary
77%10 analyzed articles/videos11,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caryn James results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 10,493 hits. Analysis detected 52,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,336 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 34% (6,291 of 9,471 authors). This Caryn James is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Caryn James
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
34%Caryn James (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 60,336
Article count: 10
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510033.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles60.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.4%17.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate