Author summary
40%2 analyzed articles/videos1,285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caleb Lunetta results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 2,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 45% (5,295 of 9,471 authors). This Caleb Lunetta is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Caleb Lunetta
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
45%Caleb Lunetta (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,140
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510044.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.1%3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate