Author summary
14%3 analyzed articles/videos927 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bay City News results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 172 hits. Analysis detected 1,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,708 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (7,000 of 8,658 authors). This Bay City News is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Bay City News
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
20%Bay City News (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,708
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510019.2% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.7%2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate