Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ava Keogh results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Burden of Proof , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 51 hits . Analysis detected 293 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,195 authors). This Ava Keogh is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ava Keogh
Author details
Total words: 1,036
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst