Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Castillo results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 2,147 hits . Analysis detected 15,393 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,990 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 88% (1,201 of 9,471 authors). This Andrea Castillo is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Andrea Castillo
Author details
Total words: 6,990
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.3% percentile 4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.7% 9.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 20.3% 20.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 30.7% 30.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 30.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.3%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 14.5%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 12.6%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst