Author summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Hubbard results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 279 hits . Analysis detected 1,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,868 of 9,471 authors). This Amy Hubbard is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Amy Hubbard
Author details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.3% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst