Author summary
10%1 analyzed article/video1,279 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexander Shur results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 1,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (7,562 of 8,785 authors). This Alexander Shur is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Alexander Shur
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
14%Alexander Shur (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,116
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

14% percentile
025507510013.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos