Author summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Lichtenstein results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 105 faulty-reasoning hits from 556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (1,900 of 9,471 authors). This Adam Lichtenstein is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Adam Lichtenstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠80%Adam Lichtenstein (selected)4%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 556
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

80% percentile
025507510079.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles556 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos