Topic summary
⁠52%2 analyzed articles/videos2,678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zionism results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,027 hits. Analysis detected 8,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,712 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (17,483 of 24,560 topics). This Zionism is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Zionism
Topic details
Total words: 10,712
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.0%0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos