Topic summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zinc Batteries results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 434 hits. Analysis detected 1,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (6,469 of 23,900 topics). This Zinc Batteries is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Zinc Batteries
Topic details
Total words: 1,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 21.8%21.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos