Topic summary
⁠86%3 analyzed articles/videos1,926 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women In Business results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 1,032 hits. Analysis detected 7,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,682 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (10,084 of 23,334 topics). This Women In Business is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Women In Business
Topic details
Total words: 6,682
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.4%15.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos