Topic summary
42% 2 analyzed articles/videos 852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 405 hits . Analysis detected 1,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,992 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 64% (8,183 of 22,495 topics). This Wisconsin is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Wisconsin
Topic details
Total words: 2,992
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.6% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst