Topic summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Williamsburg results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Negativity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 8 hits. Analysis detected 8 faulty-reasoning hits from 240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (7,227 of 21,790 topics). This Williamsburg is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Williamsburg
Topic details
Total words: 240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles240 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos