Topic summary
⁠17%2 analyzed articles/videos380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Rescue results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Unattributed Quote, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 1,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,444 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (18,751 of 23,633 topics). This Wildlife Rescue is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Wildlife Rescue
Topic details
Total words: 3,444
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.6%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos