Topic summary
23% 7 analyzed articles/videos 8,215 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Management results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 2,129 hits . Analysis detected 11,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,216 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (23,717 of 24,407 topics). This Wildfire Management is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Wildfire Management
Topic details
Total words: 32,216
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 0.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles32.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst