Author summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miles Morrisseau results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 648 hits . Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (3,133 of 9,471 authors). This Miles Morrisseau is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Miles Morrisseau
Author details
Total words: 3,380
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Straw Man: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst