Topic summary
78% 15 analyzed articles/videos 6,502 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Dc results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 7,537 hits . Analysis detected 46,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,496 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 46% (13,321 of 24,545 topics). This Washington Dc is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group. Washington Dc
Topic details
Total words: 41,496
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score15 analyzed articles41.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst