Author summary
0% 10 analyzed articles/videos 5,076 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Condé Nast results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 1,133 hits . Analysis detected 9,936 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,235 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 8% (8,507 of 9,158 authors). This Condé Nast is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group. Condé Nast
Author details
Total words: 20,235
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.1% percentile 1.0% BS Score10 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.0% 0.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst