Topic summary
60% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Crimes Investigations results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 628 hits . Analysis detected 5,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,572 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,741 of 22,604 topics). This War Crimes Investigations is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. War Crimes Investigations
Topic details
Total words: 5,572
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst