Topic summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War & Peace results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 566 hits . Analysis detected 3,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 69% (7,672 of 24,545 topics). This War & Peace is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. War & Peace
Topic details
Total words: 3,656
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst