Topic summary
⁠34%5 analyzed articles/videos5,827 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Volunteering results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Indoctrination, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,530 hits. Analysis detected 11,945 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,308 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (20,455 of 22,929 topics). This Volunteering is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Volunteering

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles23.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos