Topic summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virtual Reality Training results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 301 hits . Analysis detected 1,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 73% (6,258 of 22,829 topics). This Virtual Reality Training is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Virtual Reality Training
Topic details
Total words: 1,976
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst