Topic summary
99% 2,307 analyzed articles/videos 700,382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Video results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 628,475 hits . Analysis detected 6,901,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,272,102 analyzed words across 2,299 videos, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,700 of 21,637 topics). This Video is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Video
Topic details
Total words: 3,272,102
Video count: 2299
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.7% percentile 3.9% BS Score2,299 analyzed articles3.3M analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 19.2% 19.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 19.0% 19.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 17.4% 17.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst