Topic summary
82%2 analyzed articles/videos1,771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Vice President results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 838 hits. Analysis detected 8,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,084 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 51% (11,702 of 23,784 topics). This US Vice President is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
US Vice President
Topic details
Total words: 7,084
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate