Topic summary
86% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ufos results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,980 hits . Analysis detected 16,951 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,872 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (12,513 of 24,545 topics). This Ufos is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Ufos
Topic details
Total words: 15,872
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles15.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst