Topic summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Travel Etiquette results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 233 hits . Analysis detected 2,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 42% (12,916 of 22,261 topics). This Travel Etiquette is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. Travel Etiquette
Topic details
Total words: 3,364
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst