Topic summary
20% 2 analyzed articles/videos 814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suspicious Death results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 262 hits . Analysis detected 1,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,256 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 43% (13,702 of 23,769 topics). This Suspicious Death is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Suspicious Death
Topic details
Total words: 3,256
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst