Topic summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Justices results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 535 hits. Analysis detected 4,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,183 of 23,574 topics). This Supreme Court Justices is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Justices
Topic details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 20.9%20.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.8%24.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 10.8%10.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.2%8.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Horn Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos