Topic summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Superhero Series results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 240 hits . Analysis detected 1,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,434 of 22,513 topics). This Superhero Series is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group. Superhero Series
Topic details
Total words: 1,860
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.9% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst