Topic summary
⁠65%3 analyzed articles/videos1,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sudan results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 998 hits. Analysis detected 4,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,440 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (9,402 of 24,545 topics). This Sudan is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Sudan
Topic details
Total words: 5,440
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos