Topic summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Studio Collaborations results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Availability Heuristic , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 299 hits . Analysis detected 2,928 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 61% (9,758 of 24,495 topics). This Studio Collaborations is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Studio Collaborations
Topic details
Total words: 3,220
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst