Topic summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 1,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Structuralism results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 729 hits . Analysis detected 3,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 53% (10,507 of 22,261 topics). This Structuralism is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Structuralism
Topic details
Total words: 4,300
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst