Author summary
â 76% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Miller results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 3,033 hits . Analysis detected 13,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,900 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of â 53% (4,514 of 9,471 authors). This Laura Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Laura Miller
Author details
Total words: 12,900
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.5% 23.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst