Topic summary
⁠15%3 analyzed articles/videos609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Storm Damage results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 413 hits. Analysis detected 2,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,528 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (18,464 of 24,545 topics). This Storm Damage is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Storm Damage
Topic details
Total words: 5,528
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos