Topic summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sources results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 627 hits. Analysis detected 2,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (4,739 of 24,545 topics). This Sources is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Sources
Topic details
Total words: 3,116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.8%8.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos