Topic summary
⁠73%4 analyzed articles/videos3,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smart Home Technology results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 2,461 hits. Analysis detected 15,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,755 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (15,162 of 24,545 topics). This Smart Home Technology is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Smart Home Technology
Topic details
Total words: 19,755
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos