Author summary
99% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naima Karp results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 52.5% saturation with 5,745 hits . Analysis detected 18,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,946 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,118 of 9,487 authors). This Naima Karp is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Naima Karp
Author details
Total words: 10,946
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.2% percentile 5.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 52.5% 52.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.6% 14.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.4% 14.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 52.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 14.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Loss Aversion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst