Topic summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video5,529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Small Space Solutions results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 8,271 hits. Analysis detected 15,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (9,875 of 21,651 topics). This Small Space Solutions is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Small Space Solutions
Topic details
Total words: 22,116
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles22.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 37.4%37.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 37.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos