Topic summary
⁠96%3 analyzed articles/videos8,689 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Skincare results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 15,424 hits. Analysis detected 41,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,532 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (13,863 of 24,545 topics). This Skincare is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Skincare
Topic details
Total words: 41,532
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles41.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 37.1%37.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 37.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos