Topic summary
⁠82%4 analyzed articles/videos2,272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Save America Act results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,124 hits. Analysis detected 10,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,088 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (11,046 of 24,680 topics). This Save America Act is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Save America Act
Topic details
Total words: 9,088
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos