Topic summary
⁠20%2 analyzed articles/videos325 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Events results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 1,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,380 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (20,088 of 23,996 topics). This San Francisco Events is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
San Francisco Events
Topic details
Total words: 3,380
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos